Manchester United Women: A Defining Transfer Window Ahead
Manchester United Women stand at a crossroads.
A Champions League quarter-final on the resume, but no European football to show for last season. That contradiction tells you exactly where this team is: good enough to trade blows with the elite on a given night, not yet built to live with them week after week.
A latecomer trying to crash the party
Context matters. United only reformed their women’s side eight years ago. In that time, City, Arsenal and Chelsea have been stacking titles, building structures, embedding philosophies. United have been playing catch-up.
There has been progress. Champions League qualification. Three cup finals. A first major trophy in the FA Cup. The club has edged closer to the game’s top table. But they are still the new guests in a room full of established heavyweights, and the gap in foundations shows.
To close it, United needed to move aggressively on and off the pitch. Instead, they’ve too often moved cautiously while their rivals accelerated.
Depth exposed on four fronts
Squad depth has been the glaring weakness, brutally exposed last season when United tried to juggle the WSL, domestic cups and the Champions League. The issue wasn’t subtle. It was structural.
Recruitment hasn’t been a disaster. Far from it. Last summer, Julia Zigiotti Olme and Jess Park arrived and both proved to be excellent additions. The problem was volume. They were two of only three signings before a campaign in which Marc Skinner’s side would compete on four fronts. It was never going to be enough, and the strain told long before the season was done, even with some January reinforcements.
This summer was supposed to be different. So far, the evidence is thin.
Rivals pressing the accelerator
Look around the league and the contrast is stark.
Manchester City, fresh from winning the WSL and FA Cup, openly signalled they would not rip up a title-winning squad. Yet they still managed to add quality and protect what they have. Beth Mead, a proven elite attacker with a history of delivering on big stages, has come in. Niamh Charles, another England international, plugs a clear gap at left-back. Just as significantly, City fought off Chelsea’s advances to tie down Khadija Shaw, the WSL Golden Boot winner, to a new deal. Champions strengthen from a position of power. City have done exactly that.
Arsenal have gone in even harder. Seven years without a league title is too long for a club of their stature, and their response has been emphatic. Georgia Stanway, Ona Batlle, Selina Cerci, Geraldine Reuteler and Lisa Baum have all been announced in a blistering two-week burst. On top of that, they remain in the hunt for Barcelona free agent Salma Paralluelo. This is the kind of transfer work that doesn’t just close gaps; it can tilt a title race.
Chelsea’s window has been messy but still meaningful. They have swung and missed in the centre-forward market, seeing bids for Shaw, Paralluelo and Felicia Schroder all rebuffed. Yet they’ve still landed Katie McCabe, one of the most versatile and influential players in the league, and added Matsukubo, a standout performer in the NWSL last season at just 21. Reports suggest Paris Saint-Germain striker Romee Leuchter is now on her way, which would finally address the No.9 problem.
These are clubs operating with clarity and intent.
United’s quiet summer – and loud warning signs
And United? One arrival so far: Andrea Medina, a talented 22-year-old capable of playing at centre-back or left-back. It’s a smart signing, and she should help with depth. But she is also, for now, the only signing.
The silence elsewhere is deafening. Transfer noise around United has centred less on who might arrive and more on who might go.
Melvine Malard is reportedly closing in on a move to Chelsea. The Athletic reports that United are prepared to sell Elisabeth Terland, last season’s top scorer, if a suitable offer arrives. The logic is understandable: cash in now and reinvest, rather than lose the Norway international for nothing next summer. But it also underlines the fragility of the squad’s attacking core.
Terland turned down a new deal in November. She is not alone in entering the final year of her contract. Ella Toone is in the same position and, when asked about her future last month, offered no assurances.
“Obviously it’s now time to talk,” Toone said. “I just know I have got to make a decision on what’s best for me.”
That line will chill United supporters. Because this isn’t just about chasing City, Arsenal and Chelsea. It’s also about holding off the pack behind.
Mid-table no more: the chasing pack closes in
The middle of the WSL is no longer a soft landing. It’s a launchpad.
London City Lionesses are the most obvious emerging threat. Backed by billionaire Michele Kang, who also owns Washington Spirit and Lyon, they have made the statement signing of the summer by bringing two-time Ballon d’Or winner Alexia Putellas to England. Alongside her, four-time Champions League winner Mapi Leon, former United and England No.1 Mary Earps and prolific Germany forward Nicole Anyomi have all joined. That is not a mid-table project. That is a club trying to gatecrash the elite.
Tottenham are moving sharply as well. They finished just one place and four points behind United last season, drawing both league meetings. This summer, they have already added five new faces. Among them: Shekiera Martinez, who scored 16 league goals for a struggling West Ham; Kirsty Hanson, whose WSL tally last term was bettered only by Shaw and Alessia Russo; and goalkeeper Selma Panengstuen, who reportedly chose Spurs over Arsenal and PSG. Those are the decisions that signal changing perceptions.
Brighton, who also caused United problems last season, are building from a position of momentum after reaching the FA Cup final in May. The signing of former Arsenal midfielder Lia Walti is a coup and another sign that ambition is spreading beyond the traditional giants.
United are not just trying to climb. They are trying not to be overtaken.
Money, reality and the size of the task
Last summer, as fees in the women’s game hit new heights, Skinner was candid. United, he admitted, could not compete with the seven-figure sums that took Olivia Smith to Arsenal and Grace Geyoro to London City.
“The reality is we have to try and find our own way to do it,” he said.
In fairness, United did some good business within those constraints. But they did not do enough of it to build a squad capable of coping with the demands of four competitions. The result was predictable: flashes of quality, followed by fatigue, inconsistency and, ultimately, a season that ended without European qualification.
This year, there will be no Champions League. That is a blow to prestige and recruitment, but also an opportunity. City used a year out of Europe to reset, refocus and storm to the WSL title. United will try to do something similar, banking on a lighter schedule and hoping their January signings can now fully bed in.
Lea Schuller is central to that hope. The striker arrived from Bayern Munich with a prolific scoring record but managed just two goals in her first 18 appearances. With six months of adaptation behind her, United need her to look more like the finisher they thought they had signed.
A window that will define the next chapter
None of that changes the basic truth: this squad needs major strengthening. Not tweaks. Not one or two smart additions. A genuine injection of quality and depth across the pitch.
United are trying to compete with City, Arsenal and Chelsea at the top while also fending off ambitious, well-funded clubs below. That is a brutal place to stand still, let alone drift.
This is a defining transfer window for the club. A slow start does not guarantee failure, and the market can move quickly. But as things stand, the response to a disappointing, revealing season has been too quiet for comfort.
United know exactly where they are in the women’s game. The question now is whether they are prepared to act like a club that wants to stay at the top table – or risk watching others take their seat.


