Iran Files Complaint with Fifa Over US World Cup Travel Restrictions
Iran’s World Cup campaign, already played under a cloud of geopolitics and security tension, has taken another sharp turn off the pitch. The Football Federation of Iran (FFIRI) will lodge an official complaint with Fifa over stringent US visa conditions that they argue leave their national team at a competitive disadvantage at the 2026 tournament.
Under the current arrangements, Iran are only permitted to enter the United States — co-hosts alongside Canada and Mexico — one day before each match on US soil, and must leave the country on the same day the game is played.
For a team trying to survive at the highest level, that is a brutal turnaround.
“Most oppressed” at the tournament
The impact of those restrictions burst into public view after Iran’s opening 2-2 draw with New Zealand in Los Angeles. Head coach Amir Ghalenoei, frustrated by the logistical squeeze and the wider context surrounding his squad, described Iran as the “most oppressed” team at the tournament.
The federation put that anger into formal language. In a statement, the FFIRI said the travel rules are “inconsistent with the principle of providing equal conditions for all participating teams and may negatively affect teams’ preparation processes”.
The conclusion was clear: “Consequently, the federation will formally express its dissatisfaction and lodge an official complaint with Fifa through the appropriate channels.”
This is not a passing gripe about hotel locations or training pitches. Iran insist the framework around their participation undermines the basic sporting promise of a level playing field.
Visas denied, tickets revoked, tension rising
Iran’s presence at this World Cup has felt fragile for months. Their involvement has been overshadowed by the war in the Middle East and associated security concerns, with politics never far from the touchline.
Multiple “integral” members of the team’s backroom staff were denied US entry visas, forcing Ghalenoei and his players to operate without key personnel. On top of that, the FFIRI say their ticket allocation for matches in the US was revoked on the eve of the tournament, prompting a public appeal to Fifa to “uphold the principles of neutrality, fairness, and established regulations”.
The governing body’s president, Gianni Infantino, stepped directly into the storm. He visited the Iran dressing room after the draw with New Zealand in Los Angeles, a highly visible move as tensions simmered around the squad.
Yet the core issue for Iran remains the same: how can they properly prepare when they are effectively treated as day-trippers in the host nation?
Base camp moved, schedule squeezed
Iran originally planned to base themselves in Arizona, a logical choice for a team with multiple group games in the United States. The conflict in the Middle East and the security picture around their fixtures pushed them to rip up that plan.
They shifted their base to Tijuana in Mexico instead. From there, they must shuttle in and out of US cities under the tight visa conditions.
Iran say they requested a more standard football schedule: arrive in each host city two days before every match, return to base the day after. That window, they argue, is essential “to achieve optimal technical and physical preparation”.
Their request for the New Zealand game was rejected. The same pattern, the FFIRI say, has now been repeated for their second group match.
Belgium await in Los Angeles on 21 June (20:00 BST), with kick-off set for 12:00 local time. Iran wanted to travel to LA two days before the match to acclimatise, hold a final training session in the stadium’s conditions and complete tactical work on the pitch.
“Despite the technical reasons presented by the federation, the request was once again denied,” the FFIRI said.
For elite athletes, those lost hours matter. Jet lag, heat, local conditions, routine — all of it feeds into performance at this level. Iran believe they are being forced to compete with one hand tied behind their back.
US response: “They agreed to these terms”
From the American side, the message is blunt: Iran knew the deal.
“The Iranian national football team agreed to these terms,” a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson told the BBC when asked about Ghalenoei’s comments.
Andrew Giuliani, executive director of the White House Fifa Task Force, laid out the framework in an interview with CBS News.
“The team will be allowed to come in, match day minus one, so the day before the match,” he said. “They’ll be asked to leave the day that the match wraps up, so the evening of the match. And they’ll be able to do that again in Los Angeles.”
In other words, there is no surprise, no late change, from the US perspective. Security dictates the rules; Iran signed up to them.
What has changed is the intensity of the spotlight. The presidents of the US and Iran have signed an initial peace deal aimed at ending the war, yet the fallout of that conflict still shapes how one of the World Cup’s most politically sensitive teams moves, trains and competes.
Two games, one question
Iran have two group matches left, both on US soil. Belgium in Los Angeles. Egypt in Seattle on 27 June (04:00 BST).
Every trip will follow the same pattern: in the day before, out the night of the game. No extra days to settle, no extended stay to recover.
On paper, the rules are fixed. On the pitch, the margins are fine. Iran now head into the decisive phase of their group campaign asking whether a World Cup that promises equal conditions for all can truly deliver that when one team is living out of a suitcase at the border.


