Liverpool's Midfield Gamble: No Replacement for Curtis Jones
Liverpool are standing firm. Curtis Jones has gone, the noise around their midfield grows louder by the day, yet the plan at Anfield is clear: no replacement, no late scramble, no big-money fix.
Jones’ £30m move to Inter Milan – agreed with a year left on his deal and framed as a clean break for all sides – has left a visible gap in Andoni Iraola’s squad. The academy graduate offered control, press resistance and tactical discipline in a unit that already looks short of a specialist holding midfielder.
That frailty was brutally exposed in the 2-2 draw with Newcastle on Sunday. Every time Liverpool overcommitted, Newcastle’s counters sliced through the middle of the pitch. The same questions that have hung over this team for three seasons resurfaced in one chaotic afternoon.
The reaction was instant. Supporters, pundits, former players – all calling for a defensive midfielder before the window shuts. Yet inside the club, the mood is very different.
No new midfielder planned
James Pearce, writing in The Athletic, has echoed what Liverpool insiders have been saying for weeks: Iraola intends to replace Jones from within, not in the transfer market.
“Despite the clamour for midfield reinforcements, which intensified after Sunday’s dramatic 2-2 draw with Newcastle, senior club sources say Liverpool’s focus remains on bolstering their attacking options out wide,” Pearce reported.
“They don’t intend to replace Jones, as they see teenager Trey Nyoni as ready to step up and play a bigger part this season. Unless there’s a change of stance, it’s only the forward line which will be strengthened.”
It is a bold call. Dominik Szoboszlai is attack-first. Ryan Gravenberch and Alexis Mac Allister are more comfortable as No 8s than as a pure No 6. The structural issue is obvious. Liverpool know it. They are still choosing a different route.
Iraola’s early doubts
This was not blind faith from day one. According to TEAMtalk’s Graeme Bailey, Iraola initially pushed for cover when it became clear Jones might leave.
“Before pre-season I am told that Andoni Iraola, aware of the Curtis Jones situation, was worried about the depth – one reason he wanted Jones to stay,” Bailey said.
That concern triggered a sweep of the market. Liverpool ran the rule over a range of options, some of them headline names. Bailey revealed that Bruno Guimaraes and Sandro Tonali were both looked at before their respective moves to Arsenal and Tottenham this summer.
“Iraola also wanted work done on other options and we can confirm that was the case,” Bailey added. “A host of options were assessed – they looked at the Elliot Anderson, Sandro Tonali and Bruno Guimaraes situations, but they were not right for them.”
The price of youth
Liverpool did not stop at established names. They went deep on younger midfielders as well, trying to find value without compromising on quality.
Adam Wharton, Alex Scott and Lamine Camara were among those extensively scouted and analysed. The feedback on talent and potential was positive. The numbers were not.
“But the likes of Adam Wharton, Alex Scott and Lamine Camara – very good young players – have been assessed and they like what they have seen and heard, but we are talking £50, £60 or even more than £70million in terms of deals,” Bailey explained.
In other words, Liverpool felt the market was inflated. The club chose to walk away rather than pay what they viewed as over-the-odds fees for players who would still need time to grow into leading roles.
Nyoni’s moment
That decision throws the spotlight squarely on Trey Nyoni. The teenager is highly regarded inside the club, seen as technically gifted, intelligent without the ball and mentally ready to handle a bigger stage.
Liverpool’s hierarchy believe he can help plug the gap left by Jones and offer Iraola a fresh, internal solution in a position that has become the team’s most debated fault line. It is a huge show of trust in a player yet to prove himself over a long Premier League season.
Outside the club, patience is thinner.
Sturridge sounds the alarm
Daniel Sturridge, watching the same Newcastle game as everyone else, voiced what many Liverpool fans feel: this midfield imbalance is not new, and it should have been fixed by now.
The former striker has criticised the club for failing to land a £39m defensive midfield target this summer, arguing that the hole at the base of Liverpool’s midfield has existed for three years. The names change, the coach has changed, but the same vulnerability keeps reappearing whenever the game becomes stretched.
So the picture is set. Liverpool have cashed in on Curtis Jones, run through a long list of potential signings, balked at the asking prices and turned inwards. Iraola will lean on Szoboszlai, Gravenberch, Mac Allister – and, crucially, Nyoni – to carry the load.
The question now is brutally simple: can a title-chasing side really gamble its season on a teenager and a midfield that has already been picked apart in week two?


